Ukraine tries to make the case that it can win the war

Ukrainian first lady Olena Zelenska carried the message personally to Washington on Wednesday, making a rare appearance before Congress by a foreign first spouse. She pleaded for more weapons, saying Russia was “destroying our country.″⁣


Despite the Ukrainians’ renewed optimism, military analysts and Western officials say that it’s far too soon to forecast a turn in fortunes and that a long slog seems likely. They caution against hanging too many hopes on particular weapons amid the chaos and fluidity of a front line that winds hundreds of miles from Kharkiv in the north to Mykolaiv in the south.

“We are now achieving what we have not achieved before,” said Taras Chmut, director of a nongovernmental group aiding Ukrainian soldiers. “But there was no breakthrough at the front. There is no panacea, no magic wand, that will lead to victory tomorrow.”

Still, in Kyiv this week, senior Ukrainian security officials projected optimism.

“The faster our partners supply us with weapons, the faster we will end this war,” said Oleksiy Danilov, head of Ukraine’s national security council. Ukraine has no intention of ceding territory in a negotiated settlement, as some in the West have suggested, he said. “This is just a question of who beats whom.”

Ukraine received affirmation of its strategy from the United States on Wednesday, when the Pentagon committed to supplying four more HIMARS rocket launchers and other potent weaponry, including two NASAMS air-defense systems to help Ukraine protect against missile strikes. And Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin offered a more optimistic assessment of Ukraine’s chances

Ukrainians fire toward Russian controlled territory in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine.Credit:Mauricio Lima/The New York Times

“Our assistance is making a real difference on the ground,” Austin told a gathering of Western defence officials. “Russia thinks that it can outlast Ukraine — and outlast us. But that’s just the latest in Russia’s string of miscalculations.”

Britain’s top intelligence officer, Richard Moore, head of MI6, also provided an optimistic assessment, saying of Russia’s military “I think they are about to run out of steam.” Moore said Russian forces “will have to pause in some way, and that will give Ukrainians opportunities to strike back.”

Away from the battlefield, Ukraine got renewed economic support from the European Union, which is proposing that members reduce their gas consumption, fearing that President Vladimir Putin will cut off Russia’s gas exports to them. On Thursday, Russia resumed the flow of gas through a vital pipeline to Germany, easing fears of shortages, at least for the moment.

A month ago, it looked like Russia had a significant upper hand. Ukrainian soldiers fought fierce, bloody and ultimately losing street battles and artillery duels for the cities of Sievierodonetsk and Lysychansk in eastern Ukraine. Some Western officials questioned the wisdom of such a scorched-earth approach, saying Ukraine could not win a war of attrition.


Even President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in a rare public rumination over strategy, acknowledged the high costs in lives of trying to hold ground against the brunt of Russia’s army in the mostly deserted, destroyed communities, which he called “dead cities,” saying 60 to 100 Ukrainian soldiers were dying each day. Other Ukrainian officials put the toll higher.

Ukrainian commanders said drawing out the phase of urban combat inflicted more casualties on the Russians than Ukrainians. Reznikov, the Ukrainian defence minister, said that 9,000 to 11,000 Russian troops were killed in the fighting there, which he said justified the Ukrainian tactics. (His claim could not be independently verified).

The intensity of the fighting has diminished in the Donbas since Sievierodonetsk fell and the Ukrainians withdrew from Lysychansk, suggesting the Russians were either pausing to reposition or that their capabilities were significantly degraded. Attention has shifted south and west to the area near the Dnieper River, where Ukraine has made use of long-range artillery supplied by Western countries including the United States to strike targets deeper behind the front lines.

As it steps up attacks in the south, Ukraine is confronting another strategic quandary: how it should use its new, lethal capabilities. Concentrate firepower to defend in the east or attack toward the occupied southern city of Kherson, which is held by Russians but seen as vulnerable?

“Strategy is about choices, and choices come with trade-offs,” said Michael Kofman, director of Russian studies at CNA, a research institute in Arlington, Virginia.

Western officials understand Ukraine’s desire to reclaim territory and deliver a victory that will give hope to its people. But some Western officials fear its military is not ready for a major counteroffensive in the region near Kherson.

Ukraine counters that it has avoided hasty or risky maneuvers with the new weaponry and will not move prematurely.

“We understand we do not have enough resources now to take an active strategy,” said Brigadier General Oleksandr Kyrylenko, deputy chief of staff of the Ukrainian armed forces. “We are working with our partners. When we have enough, we will decide on future actions.”

Defeating the Russian army remains within Kyiv’s reach now but not indefinitely as Western support rides on signs Ukraine can liberate occupied areas, said Evelyn Farkas, director of the McCain Institute and a former deputy assistant secretary of defence for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia.

“It’s not enough for them to hold back the Russians,” Farkas said. “If the Ukrainians cannot show some battlefield success, and the more dramatic the better, U.S. and European support for the war effort will weaken.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Source link

Denial of responsibility! insideheadline is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Source: News